Search for: "P. T.2" Results 1 - 20 of 14,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2009, 2:33 pm by Bartolus
Today’s judgment in Joined Cases C-501/06 P, C-513/06 P, C-515/06 P and C-519/06 P GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited (“GSK”) v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:14 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/25/2023 "T H E W H I T E H OU S E W A S H I N G T O N S e p t e m b e r 2 9 , 2 0 2 3 P r e s i d e n t i a l D e t e r m i n a t i o n N o . 2 0 2 3 - 1 4 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE SUBJECT: Presidential Determination with Respect to the Efforts of Foreign Governments Regarding… [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 9:16 am by Big Tent Democrat
S&P’s $2 trillion mistake led to a very misleading picture of debt sustainability – the foundation for their initial judgment. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Commonality: P&G argued that there was no common injury, only anecdotal evidence that Align didn’t work for the named plaintiffs. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:34 am by Diane Marie Amann
As has been evident in the 2-plus years of Syria’s civil war, by exercising its veto a P-5 member can leave a matter run its course without international intervention no matter what the casualty count. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:20 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Subsection (2) of the UM/UIM statute provides that “[t]he limits of uninsured motorist coverage shall be not less than the limits of bodily injury liability insurance purchased by the named insured. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:20 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Subsection (2) of the UM/UIM statute provides that “[t]he limits of uninsured motorist coverage shall be not less than the limits of bodily injury liability insurance purchased by the named insured. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(c).)Secondary sources: McCormick on Evidence (7th ed. 2013) The Hearsay Rule, § 249, p. 189, fn. 2; Witkin, Cal. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 1:27 pm
("[T]he respondent claims that the trial court (1) incorrectly concluded that he failed to achieve a sufficient degree of personal rehabilitation as would encourage the belief that, within a reasonable time, he could assume a responsible position in the life of P, (2) incorrectly determined that termination of his parental rights was in the best interest of P and (3) failed to canvass him adequately.... [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 1:43 pm
(I think this will be in tomorrow's print paper; it's on the website this evening.)And, speaking of police, see this morning's long front-page story, Lewis Kamb & Eric Nalder, Cops who lie don't always lose jobs: P-I review finds 2 dozen cases where officers weren't fired, Seattle P-I, Jan. 29, 2008. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:35 am by rtruman
Parents Can’t Sue Drug Firms When Vaccines Cause Harm, Supreme Court Holds 6-2 :: Brusewitz v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 1:00 pm by Jon Brodkin
" In all, AT&T insiders received more than $1 million in bribes from Fahd and his co-conspirators, who fraudulently unlocked more than 2 million cell phones, the government alleged. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:46 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
The latest issue of the Pécs Journal of International and European Law (Vol. 2023, nos. 1-2) is out. [read post]
22 May 2010, 5:15 pm by Paul Lomio
CODE by Will Tress Golden Gate University Law Review, Vol. 40, Issue #2, Winter 2010, p. 129 Conclusion (p. 164) Three features that detract from the U.S. [read post]
31 May 2023, 7:26 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
The latest issue of the Pécs Journal of International and European Law (Vol. 2022, no. 2) is out. [read post]